The 2010 Drug Strategy and proposals to transition into Public Health England have signalled that treatment of a wider range of substance misuse, including steroids, should be integrated. This new approach is accompanied by a shift in power to local areas, who will commission services to meet locally assessed need. As the NTA's Good practice in harm reduction report (2008) noted, some local areas are already responding to demand for needle and syringe provision to PIEDs users. However, this has been, and will likely remain a matter for local areas to decide upon as prevalence of steroid use varies widely across the country.
In 2010, the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) considered the evidence of harms on the use of anabolic steroids, and provided advice on potential interventions to reduce these harms. See here for their report.
Many users of anabolic steroids, and other performance-image enhancing drugs such as hormones and melanotan, are injecting them. They are potentially at risk of a number of associated serious harms. Harms include damage to the injection site as a result of poor injecting technique; bacterial and fungal infections (such as localised abscesses and systemic infections) as a result of poor injecting technique, contaminated drug products, and sharing vials and/or reusing injecting equipment; and, blood-borne viruses such as HIV, Hepatitis B and hepatitis C as a result of sharing used injecting equipment or sharing vials (that have become contaminated through reuse of injecting equipment) with others.
General principles of health protection from the wider drug using population have been adapted for PIEDs users, and are implemented in a number of services (in particular NSPs) across the UK. NSPs have typically focussed on intravenous injectors, initially those using opiates and more recently those engaged in polydrug use. However, it appears that they have been increasingly accessed by those injecting anabolic steroids